<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <author>
    <name>Plinky, Inc.</name>
  </author>
  <id>http://www.plinky.com/people/ChrisJFraser.xml</id>
  <link rel="self" href="http://www.plinky.com/people/ChrisJFraser.xml"/>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.plinky.com/people/ChrisJFraser"/>
  <rights>All Rights Reserved</rights>
  <title>Christopher Fraser - Plinky Answers</title>
  <updated>2009-03-17T11:31:50-06:00</updated>
  
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.plinky.com/answers/32621</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.plinky.com/answers/32621"/>
    <title>Retirement plan: Nueva York</title>
    <updated>2009-03-17T11:31:50-06:00</updated>
    <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
          <p>If money were no object (and with the current state of the economy, this&#39;d have to be the case) I&#39;d retire in New York.</p>
<p>
  <img src="http://www.plinky.com/proxy/map?key=ABQIAAAAz4I5iDWfLKXRJqwY_lxrMRSDGNZDWabFcZHPH02nr_QeuITw5hT0k3Ux-ovu3Vn8nZoGpAsaKOTz7Q&amp;zoom=11&amp;maptype=hybrid&amp;sensor=false&amp;center=40.756054%2C-73.986951&amp;size=400x300" width="400" height="300" alt="" />
</p>
<p>
  The simple reason for this is that I don&#39;t want to be bored. I don&#39;t want to ever fully relax, either, because the next step after that is boredom. New York may have many problems - drugs, violence, prostitution, etc. - but one thing is guaranteed: it&#39;ll always be exciting. When I&#39;m in my golden years, I&#39;ll be more predisposed than ever to just do nothing, but where&#39;s that going to get me? Imagine - I&#39;m sixty, with another good twenty years of my life to go, and I&#39;ve settled down in the country in a small farmhouse. Isn&#39;t that a waste? It&#39;s places like the country we go to so we can calm down for a bit - not a place where we can live.<br/><br/>I&#39;m perfectly content to slow down every once in a while, but I don&#39;t want to stop. If I retired in New York, then my life could be just beginning.
</p>

      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.plinky.com/answers/31534</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.plinky.com/answers/31534"/>
    <title>A Plinky dilemma, set on a bus. Who comes up with these?</title>
    <updated>2009-03-15T13:41:08-06:00</updated>
    <content type="html">
      <![CDATA[
          <p>If I were sat on a bus for a whole day, and had the choice between sitting next to a talkative person with a really irritating voice or a quiet person who kept staring at me, I&#39;d go for the former.</p><br />
<p>
  The basic reason for this is simple: I deplore awkwardness in all its forms, and when someone&#39;s staring at you for a whole day, never really saying anything, you end up feeling awkward. Really awkward. An irritating talkative person, on the other hand, you can go one of two ways: one, you can put their voice away as background noise and get back to sleeping/reading/listening to music; or two, you can actually get to know them. Some of the most interesting people I&#39;ve met have voices that make me want to kill them.
</p>

      ]]>
    </content>
  </entry>
 
</feed>
